An Alternative Path to the One to One Classroom.

Standard

Schools are doing the calculus. With the growing prevalence and lower cost of digital textbooks and the myriad options for tablet displays, it almost makes financial sense to go digital. Almost, but not yet.

In middle and high school the tablet has cachet, but it’s just not quite a laptop. Tweens and teens need to write, and writing on a tablet is awkward at best. The Chromebook is gaining traction because, as it is marketed, it solves many problems. You can read the digital texts on the Chromebook, it is small, but performs better than the first miserable wave of netbooks, and it can be purchased with a 3G wireless access plan for educational settings where wireless is not yet achievable.

As if getting to the One to One tipping point weren’t exciting enough, Google is now adding fuel to the silicon and PCB fire with rumors of a forthcoming heads up display (HUD). No, that’s not a scantily clad teacher dancing in front of the room. An HUD is the Kurzweilian display that utilizes fancy optics to project images that are visually accessible straight from your glasses.


I know nothing about what the price point might be on such a device, but suspend disbelief with me for a moment and imagine what the education world might look like two years from now if cheap HUD’s became a reality. Students sit in their desks or cubicles or tables or whatever, wearing HUD’s that are connected to smartphones or iPod Touches in their pockets. The smartphone serves as CPU so that all the glasses need to do is be the virtual screen for the learner.

Add to this scenario a wireless keyboard that communicates with the phone like this logitech with track pad for $31, and you have a one to one solution for the cost of the HUD (say $100 for my fantasy here), the keyboard, and the few iPod Touches that must be loaned to students who do not have a smartphone plan (much like we do with graphing calculators already). My back of the envelope calculation for a typical US school with 26% of the student body below the poverty line needing CPU loaners still gets us to One to One for under $200 per kid – and that’s if everything in that equation only lasts one year!

Let’s hope that Google elects not to make these HUD’s with tinted lenses. Can you imagine the parodies of Corey Heart lyrics?!

5 thoughts on “An Alternative Path to the One to One Classroom.

  1. whereiskatima

    With all the cool and even cooler technology to come, how exactly do students LEARN….trying to figure out what the technology does different.

    • A valid concern, Katima. My experience with edtech in the traditional classroom is that mindful implementation of tools that enable students to spend more time doing hgiher order thinking can dramatically increase student achievement. We need to be cautious, however. Not all edtech solutions are the same. And something that works in one environment does not necessarily scale everywhere. Thanks for the word of caution.

  2. Austin H. D.

    I think you should check this out: http://www.nearpod.com
    it’s a class collaboration app that synchronizes devices and content in them. You can also add activities and test students in real time :) it’s great for 1:1 learning.

    • Just checked it out. I’d heard of it before, but never taken a look until I saw your recommendation. The interface and functionality is very similar to Goorulearning only with the added benefit of student screen control when using tablets. Very cool.

What do you have to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s